Join some like-minded people in building and updating your personal website.
Location: Charlie's Coffee House, 266 Monterey Rd, South Pasadena, CA 91030
Time:
Ends:
•Finish that blog post you’ve been working on
•Demos of recent IndieWeb breakthroughs
•Share what you’ve gotten working
•Ask the experts questions
Join a community with like-minded interests. Bring friends that want a personal site!
Any questions? Ask in chat: http:/
Optional quiet writing hour starts at 5:30.
More information: https:/
Facebook event: https:/
The IndieWeb is a growing people-focused alternative to the ‘corporate web’.
Skill levels: Beginner, Intermediate, Advanced
#IndieWeb, #socialmedia, #OpenSource, #webarchitecture, #openstandards, #decentralizedweb
@lindner Congratulations!
For extending things a bit, be sure to check out: http:/
One of the things that made using my Known site much more addictive was being able to do so more easily on mobile. I wrote up a few thoughts here that you might appreciate: http:/
If you don't like the writing interface you might consider using Quill https:/
You'll find lots of fellow devs and users of Known at https:/
Good luck and let us know if you need help!
Events scraping properly or improper markup? · Issue #3 · indieweb/this-week https:/
In today's (8/12/16) edition, the upcoming note about HWC for 8/24 includes most of the usual suspects, but leaves off Los Angeles, despite the fact that many of them are listed as TBD while LA actually has data.
Am I missing something that causes it to skip over LA, or is something else going on?
@CaptainKurtis Hope it works. URL Forwarder is awesome; this post inspired many in Indieweb to use it for mobile http:/
@devonzuegel If you have questions, feel free to ask. There's a helpful group on IRC/slack if you need anything https:/
Mike, it's an edge case for many to be sure (I don't expect my mother to encounter it often), but just another of hundreds of other reasons to be part of the Indieweb. The "big reasons" sell themselves but aren't the entire raison d'etre, and I like to document some of the others when I encounter them.
I and others in academia (most of my audience) run up against it fairly frequently in relation to scientific journal articles. It's particularly egregious when big publishers like Elsevier, who insist they're adding value for their steep subscription rates, under-manage their sites and don't always approve comments that further scientific communication or require additional work on their part to editorially change/modify what they've published in print.
The particular case that spawned this particular "rant", still hasn't "approved" the comment/question I made, yet they approved a dozen or more "me too" congratulatory comments around mine that did nothing to further the conversation in the community in which it was posted.
Further proof that you can't please all of the people all of the time...
.@kevinmarks We should definitely encourage @jeffjarvis and students to attend IndieWebCamp NYC http:/
@ken_bauer @cogdog @edtechinsight @bradhinson @jessreingold @anneperez @mburtis Can't wait to apply to http:/
Reminder that Homebrew Website Club #LosAngeles tomorrow night at Charlie's Coffee House https:/
My answer to "What is your review of LiveJournal? - Quora"
It’s definitely not a good platform from an IndieWeb (http:/
If you’re choosing a platform, perhaps take a look at projects (https:/
Other resources:
* Getting Started - IndieWeb (https:/
* Transitional Steps (https:/